The project’s mission is to engage the community at large to provide a systematic photographic recording of the Lake Michigan Shoreline, a few steps at a time.

As digital media becomes the strongest communication tool of our time, sharing images from any given place has become highly relevant. Everyone wants to know how does it look “being” there. That is the success of the Google Maps phenomena. Nevertheless, Google Maps is only done from the street, for the time being.

Maybe it is time to figure out the next step. How to record systematically relevant spaces that are limited to vehicle access? Or maybe this is just a new excuse for large-scale collaborative projects, and to engage people to walk this line.

Lake Michigan has a 1,638-mile shoreline.

That means 1,906,632 images to collect

I think we have a project.

Who wants to walk? 

Visit the website. “Like” on facebook.

Image: Council of the Great Lakes Region

The event brought together business leaders representing companies like BMO, Cliffs Natural Resources, Ontario Power Generation, and the Cleveland Port Authority; thought-leading academics like Dr. Gail Krantzberg of McMaster University; environmental leaders including  Joel Brammeier of the Alliance for Great Lakes and Michelle Parker from the Shedd Aquarium; Coast Guard officials; Commissioner Lana Pollack of the International Joint Commission; and key political leaders like former Toronto Mayor David Miller and Canada’s Ambassador to the U.S., Honorable Gary Doer.

Expert panels covered many of the key binantional issues that can only be addressed as a unified force:

• Economic transformation and bi-national cooperation
• Water governance in the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Region
• Business leadership and global competitiveness
• Regional infrastructure for 21^st Century challenges
• Fostering sustainable communities
• Learning from existing efforts to build bridges
• Shared energy resources and strategies

The tone of the event was, on the whole, optimistic about the multitude of assets and opportunities in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River region to ensure a prosperous and sustainable future. These assets include, in the words of one CGLR’s organizers Dr. Matthew Mendelsohn of the Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, a great “freshwater resource, relatively healthy ecosystems, great research institutions, world class cities, and a diverse and well-educated population.”

In my view, the success of the Council will be marked by visionary thinking—its work should maintain a holistic and long-term focus. Thinking pragmatically about how to achieve change should not stop us from pursuing truly transformational “next-generation” solutions.

In a conversation about shared energy resources, most panelists were narrowly focused on the potential of natural gas as our transitional energy source. There was no conversation about innovations in lake water cooling, waste to energy, and wind power. And, a conversation on regional infrastructure did not even mention the idea of high speed rail or green infrastructure networks.

Tim Eder, Executive Director of Great Lakes Commission, stated that there was value in the Council remaining focused on a “high level, long-term vision for the sustainability of the region.” He was there representing his organization’s work to bring stakeholders together around the economic and environmental issues in the Great Lakes.

We agree!

A day and a half of panel presentations culminated in a working session to identify the Council’s next steps. It was at this working session that we proposed the idea of coalescing around a shared, long-term vision to steer future efforts of the Council. As the Council’s agenda progresses, we will continue to advocate for this high level guiding vision to ensure that efforts and decisions being made across the basin collectively move us in the right direction.

More conversation on the launch event can be found on Twitter with hashtag #CGLR.

The whirlwind day included a stop by Green City Growers Cooperative, a 3.25-acre inner-city greenhouse/hydroponics operation set to produce an impressive 60,000 heads of lettuce per week and some 300,000 lbs of herbs annually once at full capacity. Part of the Evergreen Cooperatives, Green City Growers is committed to providing fresh produce within a 50-mile radius and to empowering the inner-city neighborhood in which it’s located by providing jobs and training.

Hydroponic Lettuce, Green City Growers Cooperative

The day also included discussions with key sustainability and planning figures, including the newly-established Alliance for Water Future, the Northeast Ohio Sustainable Communities Consortium, the Cleveland Office of Sustainability, The Cleveland Foundation, the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, members of Ohio’s Balanced Growth Program, and the Cleveland Museum of Natural History and its Green City/Blue Lake Institute.

It was inspiring to witness first-hand the groundswell of sustainability efforts taking place in Cleveland and the team looks forward to incorporating the Cleveland story into the broader basin-wide narrative of what our region could look like in the coming 100 years.

What role can cities play in curtailing land consumption on the fringes?  Most of the 16 million additional people expected in the Great Lakes Region by 2050 could fit within the vacated areas of inner cities at medium densities. To illustrate, Chicago contains almost 60 square miles of vacant land. By applying the density of 24 dwelling units per acre, which is approximately the density of the French Quarter in New Orleans, all of Metropolitan Chicago’s future population growth could be accommodated in those vacant lands. If developed at 80 dwelling units an acre—equivalent to Boston’s Beacon Hill—all of Metropolitan Chicago’s growth could be accommodated in 30 percent of its vacant lands.

Infill development utilizes existing infrastructure for a better long-term environmental and economic outcome than sprawl. In some cities, the infrastructure that once supported much larger populations is underutilized and too costly to maintain with a decreasing population and tax base.  Meanwhile, suburban expansion creates the need to for more infrastructure, promoting greater congestion, pollution rates, and costs.

Data on housing starts indicate a promising turning point in the development of Great Lakes cities. In Milwaukee, Chicago, and Detroit, a growing share of housing starts are within the core city, although the majority of new housing is still outside the core city. The current real estate market makes urban properties competitive with suburban ones, and some cities offer additional incentives to developers and residents.

Portion of Housing Starts in Core Cities

The shift towards densification is evident in population data too. Chicago, Milwaukee, and Akron, Ohio are all beginning to see city population growth climb in comparison to suburban populations. As the Chicago Tribune reports, the number of people living within two miles of City Hall increased 36 percent from 2000 to 2010.

The cost of sprawl inspires us to envision a future when urban areas support the region’s growing, diverse population without encroaching upon farmland, grasslands, and forests. If regions choose to invest in core cities, it won’t be long before compact urban neighborhoods attract new residents and prosper.

Signed in 1972, the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement was principally established to ensure the U.S. and Canada were both taking action to control pollution, advance scientific research, and monitoring the water quality of the Great Lakes. The biggest threat at the time to water quality was point source pollution, from phosphorous loading by large sewage treatment plants to PCBs and mercury from industrial outfalls.

Since the original 1972 agreement and its 1978 and 1987 revisions, there have been a number of directly-related successes, including a reduction in the release of toxic substances and a significant decline in the number of invasive species introduced by ballast water.

Amended in 2012 for the third time, the Agreement is now revamped to take on today’s threats to water quality and quantity. Asian carp are aggressively making their way up the Mississippi River into the Chicago Area Water Ways. Lake levels have reached an all-time low in Lakes Huron and Michigan. And some issues of the past still linger. While we have successfully addressed point source pollution, that was arguably the easier task. Lake Erie had its worst harmful algal bloom in history in 2011 due in large part to non-point sources. The complex pollution issues of today involve increasingly intense rainfall events and the presence of the invasive zebra mussel which exacerbates the impact of phosphorus loads from non-point sources like agricultural runoff.

The 2012 Agreement builds on 40 years of binational success, and establishes new commitments to address today’s threats and yesterday’s challenges that remain.

New and retained areas of focus (“Annexes”) to the 2012 Agreement are:

On January 23, 2013, the Great Lakes Century team attended a seminar hosted by the Alliance for the Great Lakes, the Canadian Consulate General in Chicago, and the International Joint Commission to discuss the collaborative and inclusive way forward in implementing the revised Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement.

There was an excitement and, at the same time, anxiety in the room for the mammoth task that lies ahead in implementation. People expressed concern about maintaining the momentum for implementation after so much energy went into drafting the Agreement over many years. Federal funding from both sides of the border has been committed for 2013, but year-to-year the funding may be unreliable or insufficient. The goals are ambitious and commendable, but the true strength of this Agreement will only be realized in the bold leadership from both nations.

The 2012 Agreement is born in an era where public engagement and transparency are paramount for holding leadership accountable. The International Joint Commission, established under the 1909 Boundary Waters Treaty, has and continues to play an important role in enforcing the Agreement. Dareth Glance and Lana Pollack of the Commission spoke about their revitalized commitment to broaden the dialogue and to deliver more science and information to the public in a clear, transparent way. 

When it comes to actual implementation, the Agreement calls for the establishment of a Great Lakes Executive Committee to coordinate, implement, review, and report on programs, practices, and measures undertaken to achieve the purpose of this Agreement. Co-Chairs for the committee are represented by regional heads of Environment Canada and the U.S. EPA, while their staff makes up much of the member roster.

Dr. Susan Hedman, U.S. EPA – Region 5 Director, and Michael Goffin, Environment Canada – Ontario Regional Director General, described their key priorities for 2013/2014 as being, directly in line with the annexes of the Agreement:

• Combat aquatic invasive species.
• Clean up Areas of Concerns.
• Improve quality of impaired watersheds, specifically Maumee River, OH; Lower Fox River, WI; and Saginaw River, MI.

 The annexes of biggest concern may also have the biggest impact and greatest lasting effect. Joel Brammeier of the Alliance for the Great Lakes identified the following as the most important issues facing the region. 

• Chemicals and the bioaccumulation that is occurring due to thousands of unregulated sources.
• Nutrients, the policy of voluntary regulation is not working.
• Invasives destroying ecosystem and local economies.
• Climate Change and the science that is needed to understand the short and long term impacts.

Rooted in this discussion about the modernization and strengthening of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, we’ve learned about the long list of threats that make vulnerable our water quality and quantity. We’ve learned how long it takes to successfully negotiate a new protocol for protection in the 21^st Century. We’ve learned that the job of protecting this precious asset never ends and will require all of our energy for generations to come. But, the Lakes are also the life blood of this region they define our identity, provide economic opportunity, create resiliency, and are the source of our inspiration.

 This Agreement is the world’s best example of two countries coming together around the most valuable freshwater asset and peacefully protecting it. We must take a moment to reflect and celebrate this renewed commitment to the Great Lakes and then get back to work.

Game Changer Award Ceremony, New York City, February 7, 2013

A panel last week at the Shedd Aquarium — Social and Biological Impacts of Rising Seas and Reduced Lake Levels – addressed the complexities of sea and lake level projections. Two ecologists, Ben Strauss of Climate Central and Phil Willink of Shedd Aquarium, presented alongside Anthony Oliver-Smith, Professor of Anthropology at the University of Florida. The projections they shared were not exactly uplifting, but their insight was refreshing nevertheless.

Scientists are currently projecting 2-5 ft (0.6-1.5 m) sea level rise by the end of the century, based on several factors:

• Thermal expansion – As water temperatures rise due to climate change, the water itself expands under increased temperatures. This expansion spread out over the oceans is expected to increase sea levels 1ft per century.
• Retreat of land-based glaciers – If all the world’s mountain glaciers melted, there would be a 2-3 ft increase in sea level.
• Ice sheet loss – Greenland and Antarctica are melting faster than previous predictions. From 2004-2007 loss of Greenland’s ice sheet is the area of 14 states, 3 ft thick.
• Land subsidence and uplift – Some land area are sinking and others are rising. Land can sinks due to groundwater depletion (e.g., Tianjin, China), and the Great Lakes area is recovering from glacier pressure.

SOM’s City Designers who attended found several points and questions especially relevant to the future of the Great Lakes:

• We must integrate the concept of change into civic planning and management. Natural systems are dynamic, yet people and infrastructure to not adapt well to fluctuations in their environment.  How can we design our cities to be more flexible in the face of ever evolving conditions?

• Declining lake levels in the Great Lakes Basin reflect a 70 percent decline in ice cover over the last decade, which has led to increased evaporation. Lake Michigan is at an all time low of 6 ft below average. Falling lake levels may drop significantly below the level of the Chicago River, which would require the Army Corps of Engineers to either lower the water level of the Chicago River or re-reverse the flow of the river.

• We must consider both exposure (geographic, physical) and vulnerability (social construct: poverty, access to resources, coping mechanisms) when considering people’s risk for sea level rise. Developing coastal cities in Asia are some of the most exposed locations and the people moving there some of the most vulnerable. Considering this distinction, we must focus on reducing exposure and vulnerability.

• Displacement and resettlement due to sea level rise can be considered a secondary disaster if not done properly. People tend to think of resettlement/relocation as a physical process, but we shouldn’t ignore the social impacts of losing relationships and adapting to new places. Social networks are especially crucial for poor people who rely on them for key resources.

• There are some big unknowns about how sea level rise will cause settlement patterns to change:
  • Will migration be internal or international?
  • Will people move because of severe events or will there be a gradual shift away from coasts?
  • Will individuals or whole communities move?

• Furthermore, what are the outcomes of mass migration due to climate change?  What areas can take the influx? What will the living conditions be?  What happens to the abandoned places?

Thanks to Shedd Aquarium and the University of Chicago for hosting this relevant and informative event.

Check out Welton’s blog architectsandartisans.com for two new stories about our work. This first post, published yesterday, discusses the impetus for this initiative and the value of cross-boundary collaboration. In the second installment, Welton delves into the importance of planning to protect the resources of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River watershed:

Forty million people depend on the resources of the Great Lakes region, but in recent years a glut of unchecked development along its lakefront has come to mean lower water levels and increased pollution.

To protect the lake system, architects at SOM are calling for a plan shaped by global dialogue between urban designers, scholars, advocates, politicians, students, and Great Lakes area residents.

The firm calls it the “Great Lakes Century – A 100-Year Vision,” and its partner is the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative, a non-profit group made up of 91 mayors from cities in both the U.S. and Canada.

“We want to bring about the long-term economic, environmental and social sustainability of the region,” says David Ulrich, the group’s executive director and a longtime veteran with the EPA.

The initiative was established by former Chicago Mayor Richard Daley in 2003.  “He felt local governments should have a say in decisions regarding the lakes and rivers, with a seat at the table,” he says.  “He wanted to establish best practices, and felt that neither Washington D.C. or Ottawa were focusing on the region.”

Certainly, there’s no shortage of problems in the area.  What started as a concern over water quality, quantity and vitality quickly has evolved into a broader sustainability agenda.

A threat from Asian carp making their way up the Mississippi and Illinois Rivers, already just 50 miles from the Great Lakes, is imminent.  They’re a dominant species that can grow to four feet in length and 100 pounds, and they could bring an end to commercial and sport fishing in the lakes.

“They could destroy a $7 billion fishery,” he says.

Solutions call for stricter control of ballast waters, stricter screening of organisms allowed in, a restriction of their expansion and movement, and most significantly, placing physical barriers into the Chicago waterway system.

It may also mean restoring the natural divide that reversed the flow of the Chicago River in 1900.  “We think that if we restore the flow, the carp will stay in the river,” he says.

The carp are only one of 39 species that threaten the region.  Add to that climate change and six more threats that Ulrich, who calls himself a recovering attorney and an aspiring architect, can tick off at the drop of a hat, and a sense of urgency and a need for cooperation emerges.

“We want to link up the brain power around the basin, rather than compete for the research dollars and the prestige,” he says.

After all, the region represents the fourth largest economy in the world – behind those of the U.S., China and Japan.

“We have a responsibility to be stewards of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basin,” SOM Urban Design and Planning Partner Philip Enquist, FAIA, said. “We must design our cities and region to eliminate waste, and rely on more innovative and sustainable development strategies. We can and must ensure fresh water for all future generations.”

Mayor Rahm Emanuel of Chicago, board member of the Cities Initiative, praised the work of SOM and added, “The Great Lakes and St. Lawrence are our Yellowstone Park, and this vision will help people in the region and around the world understand even better what a treasure we have in our front yard.”

Chair of the Cities Initiative and Mayor of Milwaukee Tom Barrett remarked, “By bringing large and small cities together from across the basin, we have been able to think and act much more effectively as a region to tackle the tough problems of invasive species, chemical pollution, beach closures, and much more.  We are also making sure that the economic benefits that come from an abundant fresh water supply, unlimited recreational opportunities, a $7 billionfishery, and other advantages are fully utilized.”

Vice Chair Mayor Keith Hobbs of Thunder Bay, Ontario, noted, “Even though here on the north shore of Lake Superior we are many hundreds of miles away from most of our Canadian and U.S. neighbors, the unifying force of the water is bringing us closer together all the time. It is helping us act much more effectively as a cohesive community to solve the problems we face and make a better future for our children and grandchildren.”

At the far eastern edge of the basin along the St. Lawrence is Quebec City where Mayor Regis Labeaume , secretary treasurer for the Cities Initiative, remarked “When the first French explorers came to what is now Quebec City, little did they realize what a boundless treasure would unfold as they moved up the river to the Great Lakes. Over 400 years later, it is time we do even more to bring about a future that matches the magnitude and quality of the resource we are so fortunate to share.”

“The basin’s mayors are bringing to life a shared vision of a healthy and prosperous region in harmony with nature,” Enquist said, “Executive director Dave Ullrich and the Cities Initiative’s elected leaders have been fantastic partners who are making changes for the better happen from Chicago and Duluth to the Gulf of St. Lawrence.”

Here is what the AIA jury had to say:

This is a strong environmental vision for an important global natural asset. There is power in the grand scale and how it looks at regional sustainability less in terms of direct environmental protection and more in terms of a transformational shift to a green regional economy catalyzed by high speed rail connectivity.

This is a compelling effort that promotes international coordination around critical issues and necessary thinking if we are ever to address the environmental consequences of regional development. As more global attention is being paid to the scale and issues of the mega-region, this approach to examining the interconnected environmental, social, and design issues across jurisdictions offers a great precedent for practice in the future.

It’s wonderfully responsible that this is being sponsored on this scale and scope. It is a call for larger scale action and vision. These are the issues that architects, planners and urban designers should be focusing on.

We are thrilled to have Editor in Chief of Metropolis Magazine, Susan S. Szenasy, celebrate this award!